Guidelines for Selection of Distinguished Educator Award
Purpose
The Distinguished Educator Award seeks to recognize full-time faculty of the University for a consistent record of outstanding contributions to excellence in education.
Criterion
The recipients must demonstrate distinction through leadership in teaching and learning. Examplesmay include some or all of the following: development of experiential learning opportunities; effective integration of scholarship into classroom teaching; successful engagement of students in higher order learning; fostering of student development and mentoring; implementation of pedagogical innovations; curricular development; significant research/creative activity with students; exemplary departmental or student assessments of teaching; or other notable accomplishments that demonstrate the achievement of best practices in teaching. The Selection Committee will give special attention to effective integration of teaching and scholarship, and to significant research/creative activity with students. There is a presumption that each recipient is well rounded within the context of their job description.
Selection Process
Each year, there will be up to seven recipients of this award. The process of selecting awardees has three steps. First, a colleague or department chair may nominate a candidate for the award by writing a letter to the individual's dean and the chair of the Faculty Review Panel (“Review Panel”). Next, the Review Panel will vet the initial letters submitted on behalf of the nominees, solicit additional materials from each finalist’s department chair, and narrow the pool of candidates. Finally, the university-wide Faculty Award Selection Committee (“Selection Committee”) will review materials submitted on behalf of the recommended candidates and provide a recommendation to the Provost. Each of these steps is described in detail below.
Nominations
An individual may be nominated for the award by a colleague or their department chair or dean. The nomination process begins with a letter to the nominee’s dean and the chair of the school’s Review Panel identifying specific outstanding aspects of the nominee’s performance that support the award’s purpose. Nomination letters should relate accomplishments to the criteria for the award and to provide evidence for statements. This letter should be no more than 3 pages in length. All full-time faculty of the University are eligible for the Distinguished Educator Award. An individual may receive this award only once.
Recommendations
Within the schools of Law and Business, the dean will appoint a Faculty Review Panel to review letters of nomination. Within the School of Arts & Sciences, the Steering Committee will convene the Faculty Review Panel. The Review Panel should comprise of 3-5 faculty members. Within the schools of Leadership and Professional & Continuing Studies, the dean will determine an appropriate size for the Faculty Review Panel. The Review Panel will narrow the pool of nominees and will use the nomination letter, candidate’s CV, and other supporting materials in their deliberations. Chairs may also, at their discretion, correspond with nominees for clarification or additional information. After the final selection is made, the Chairs of the Review Panel will notify the dean and supply the Selection Committee with the finalists’ packets of nomination letters and vitas. Deliberations and all activities of the Review Panel shall remain confidential.
The number of individuals recommended for the award by each School is suggested to be:
- Professional & Continuing Studies - up to 1 candidate
- Leadership - up to 1 candidate
- Law - up to 2 candidates
- Business - up to 2 candidates
- Arts & Sciences - up to 6 candidates
These limits are to encourage schools to choose their best candidates for submission to the Selection Committee. Exceptions can be made on a rare occasion; if a school has an unusually large number of outstanding candidates in a given year, the dean should confer with the Selection Committee Chair about the number of nominees that the Committee will accept.
Selection
The university-wide Faculty Award Selection Committee will review the nominations submitted by the Review Panels from all schools. The Selection Committee may, at its discretion, request additional information from any individual regarding the candidates. The Selection Committee is charged to simply select the best candidate(s) from the pool of nominees.
Deliberations and all activities of the Selection Committee shall remain confidential. The Selection Committee will forward their recommendation of the best candidate(s) to the Provost of the University for final approval. The Provost will notify the winner(s) and their school dean.
Timetable for the Award Process
Key dates for the various steps in the process are as shown below:
- January 15. During the Spring semester, but no later than January 15, the Office of the Provost will send a letter to all constituencies, inviting them to submit nominations for the DFSA to the nominee's dean and the chair of the Review Panel.
- February 25. Nominations will be accepted by the school deans and the chair of the Review Panel until February 25.
- March 1. Within each school, the chair of the Faculty Review Panel will forward letters of nomination, vitas, and any other supporting materials to all committee members for review by March 1.
- March 31. The Review Panel within each school will make their final selection by March 31. The chair of the Review Panel will notify the dean and supply the Selection Committee with the finalists’ packets of nomination letters and vitas. The chair of the Selection Committee will forward packets of nomination letters and vitas to all committee members for review.
- April 30. The Selection Committee will meet to discuss and select awardee(s) and establish a process for writing summaries of awardee(s), which are due to the Provost by May 15.
- May 15. The Selection Committee will submit 250-word summaries describing the work of each awardee to the Provost of the University by May 15. Awards may be announced during the last faculty meeting of the year, at opening colloquy, or at another time to be determined by the Provost and/or Selection Committee.